All case studies
KeyCare

The KeyCare Brief, 2026 YTD.

Published October 2026

Year to Date Fact Sheet

Two thirds of visits replaced an in-person acute encounter.

Asked at eCheck-in where they would have gone instead, 65% of patients name urgent care or the emergency room.

Jan 01, 2026 – Sep 30, 2026

At a Glance: Completed Visits

Five Numbers That Frame The Year

65%

Would have been seen at an Urgent Care or ER instead

Care that would have reverted to a less convenient, higher-cost in-person setting.

10%

Would have gone to the emergency room

Emergency-room cost and low satisfaction for a problem a video visit resolved.

9%

Would not have received care at all

Care that goes unmet when inconvenience is the only barrier.

35%

Visits outside 7 a.m. – 5 p.m.

Convenient and timely access on the patient's own schedule.

31%

Returned to KeyCare for another visit

A different condition later in the year, kept inside your network.

Alternatives: Patient Reported at Check-in

Where would this care have gone otherwise?

Urgent care facility (55%)
Would have scheduled with PCP (17%)
Emergency room (10%)
Would not have received care (9%)
Another online service (6%)
Other (free text) (2%)

Where this volume is coming from

Most of it is coming out of in-person urgent care and the ER, and for 9% of visits, out of care that wasn't going to happen at all. Another virtual service accounts for 6%.

Consistent with the broader Epic community

This lines up with what Epic shares about the rest of its community, where failed scheduling attempts routinely spill over into calls, portal messages, and ED visits.

Cost Avoidance · Case Study

Regional Health System avoided $1.7M of cost

Modeled avoided cost YTD

$1.7M

6,623 completed visits · ≈ $256 per visit

Credits only emergency room and urgent care visits avoided

Nets out the cost of the KeyCare visit

How the estimate is built

VisitsNet per visitAvoided cost
Emergency room avoided927$1,601$1,484,100
Urgent care avoided3,179$66$209,800
Modeled avoided cost6,623≈ $256$1,693,900

Patient-reported alternative at eCheck-in (14% emergency room, 48% urgent care) applied to 6,623 completed visits for a single health system.

The 24-Hour Trace: Share of Completed Visits by Hour

One third of care happens after the clinic closes

12a2a4a6a8a10a12p2p4p6p8p10p0%2%4%6%8%

Two peaks

Volume peaks in the 9 a.m. hour at 7.3% of visits, eases through early afternoon, then holds a second plateau from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. that carries 22.7% of all visits.

The overnight tail

12.1% of completed visits land between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., a window in which almost no ambulatory alternative is open. With the evening block, 34.8% falls outside clinic hours.

Day of Week: Share of Completed Visits

Demand barely takes a weekend

MonTueWedThuFriSatSun16.2%14.1%14.1%14%13.8%14.8%12.9%

Flatter than a clinic

The busiest and quietest days differ by only 25%. The weekend has 27.7% of visits against a theoretical 28.6% if demand were perfectly even.

Monday is the outlier

Monday runs 13% above the average day. Sunday is the only day meaningfully below average, at an index of 90.

Who: Share of Patients

A working-age, primarily female panel

18–34

34%

35–49

33%

50–64

18%

3–17

7%

65+

6%

0–2

3%

Patient sex

73%

Female

27%

Male

<1%

Other / unknown

Two thirds in one bracket

67% of visits come from patients aged 18–49, the group least likely to have an established primary-care relationship and most likely to be working during clinic hours.

A 73/27 split

Female patients outnumber male by nearly three to one. The skew is consistent with the coded diagnoses: genitourinary conditions plus candidiasis account for 9.8% of all diagnosis lines.

Why: Share of Coded Diagnosis Lines

Respiratory illness leads the diagnosis mix

Acute sinusitis

8.4%

Acute upper respiratory infection

6.6%

Other disorders of urinary system

6.4%

Cough

3.7%

Acute pharyngitis

3.1%

Nausea and vomiting

2.8%

Conjunctivitis

2.7%

Candidiasis

2.5%

Digestive / abdominal symptoms

2.1%

Asthma

1.9%

Rolled up by body system

ClusterShare
Respiratory25.4%
Genitourinary + candidiasis9.8%
Gastrointestinal6.4%
Skin & soft tissue5.0%
Four clusters combined46.6%